Search for: "State v. Manning" Results 8841 - 8860 of 13,604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2007, 11:40 pm
Supreme Court blocked the execution of a Mississippi man who killed 20 years ago. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 3:06 am by Scott Bomboy
In the 6-3 majority decision, Justice Lewis Powell said Massachusetts couldn’t jail a man for wearing small cloth version of the United States flag sewn to the seat of his jeans. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am by JURIST Staff
The Supreme Court of Pakistan, in Shahida Zaheer Abbasi v President of Pakistan (PLD 1996 SC 632), stated that open trial inspires public confidence in the judicial process while in camera proceedings give rise to suspicions and misgivings in the mind of the common man. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Last week marked the 60th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am by Charon QC
Lawcast 203:  Kristen Heimark – From serving on the USS Lexington to practising as a London lawyer Today I am talking to Kristen Heimark, a practising lawyer in London  who started her working life serving with the United States Navy on the USS Lexington. [read post]
17 May 2007, 6:26 pm
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals has issued its decision in the Perfect 10 v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:02 am by Jeralyn
A headline reads: "Faisal Shahzad confesses to Times Square terror plot; admits he trained for 5 months in Pakistan Memo to Attorney General Eric Holder: Re: U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 7:55 am
Ct., Nassau Co., decided 1/8/2010) Wasn't it William Shakespeare who wrote in The Tempest, "Mallela acquaints a man with strange bedfellows"? [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 9:21 am by Eric
State * Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:05 pm by TDot
I was fighting hard for #1 in the competition but at this point I’ll be content just being on the team again If you want to read through the fact pattern that was used in this case, check out State v. [read post]