Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 13,226
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2022, 11:25 am
Support from the state of Florida was key to Heritage’s growth in its early years. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 4:41 pm
Hainan Provincial Price Bureau. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 12:44 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in Patel v London Borough of Hackney (2021) EWCA Civ 897 (our note) was also considered. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 5:20 am
” Cobb v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
In Yee v. [read post]
4 Jan 2024, 8:21 am
State v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 8:51 am
” Referring to the now-defunct Interstate Commerce Commission and Civil Aeronautics Board, she noted “the disastrous regulatory frameworks in the transportation industry teach the attentive student that rules stifle innovation, increase costs, raise prices, limit choice, and decrease output, frequently harming the very parties they are intended to benefit, and the benefits that flowed to consumers when competition replaced regulation in transportation. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Next week’s topics will be: Florence v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 7:15 am
In South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 9:44 pm
The PUC, however, declined to announce such a price — so the parties fell back to the $50 figure. [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 12:00 pm
County of Prince William, 89 F.3d 169, 171-72 (4th Cir. 1996); Price v. [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 5:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark’s new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION – the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 4:46 am
(IP Dragon) Denmark Denmark's new transfer pricing IP valuation guideline (IP finance) Europe ECJ: COLOR EDITION - the A-G delivers his opinion on the application by Lâncome: Lancôme v OHIM and CMS Hasche Sigle (Class 46) ECJ: Diesel ruling affirms that exhausting still trumps trademarks, but consent must be unequivocal: Makro Zelfbedieningsgroothandel CV, Metro Cash & Carry BV and Remo Zaandam BV v Diesel SpA (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI: KINDER vs TIMI… [read post]
24 Apr 2021, 12:00 pm
County of Prince William, 89 F.3d 169, 171-72 (4th Cir. 1996); Price v. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 3:50 am
Judge Fahey’s opinion, drawing upon the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s 2004 ruling in Anastos v Sable, agreed with the m [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 8:49 pm
Wentworth and its affiliates, and as set forth by those parties in their brief in the case of Ceron v. 321 Henderson Receivables, No. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:28 am
In Quickturn Design Sys., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2014, 8:00 am
Moore v. [read post]
12 Aug 2024, 1:45 pm
”[9]Cost of hiring an attorneyAttorneys have also priced themselves out of the market for providing services to low- or middle-class folks. [read post]
