Search for: "State v. State" Results 8841 - 8860 of 258,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 11:45 am by Bill Raftery
The Louisiana Constitution provides (Article V, Sections 4 & 6) Section 4. [read post]
In the 2017 case of Marquita McDonald v Symphony Bronzeville Park, LLC, the plaintiff filed a putative class action against her employer. [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 12:24 pm by Paul Singer and Beth Chun
  The Supreme Court has already announced it will take up the boundaries of Section 230 immunity this term in the Gonzalez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 9:37 pm
" And online at The Atlantic, law professor Garrett Epps has an essay titled "A Major Church-State Ruling That Shouldn't Have Happened: In Trinity v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:38 am by sally
Regina (Samuel Smith Old Brewery (Tadcaster)) v Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change [2012] EWHC 46 (Admin); [2012] WLR (D) 16 “Following the grant of a consent under section 37 of the Electricity Act 1989 (as amended) in respect of any operation or change of use that constituted development, a direction made by the Secretary of State under section 90(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 that planning permission for that and any ancillary… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme… [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: This term, the Supreme Court is considering the independent state legislature theory in Moore v. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 11:01 am
The United States Supreme Court denied cert in Exxon v. [read post]