Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 8841 - 8860 of 19,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2008, 3:46 am
" Acknowledging that only departures existed when the Rule was written, Justice Breyer advocated focusing on the purposes behind Rule 32(h), which he argued still apply in a post-Booker world. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2006, 1:13 am
Still, the trial court let the following two interrogatories to be presented to the jury:1. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:19 pm by Amy Howe
Even if there are “gaps or errors” in a state court’s reasoning, he stressed, federal courts should still uphold it on habeas review unless the decision itself is unreasonable. [read post]
24 Dec 2024, 4:40 am by Eveline Lots (Brinkhof)
In contrast, the English High Court of Justice and Court of Appeal came to a different finding, which the Dutch court says is the result of the application of the test formulated by the Supreme Court in Warner-Lambert v Generics [2018] UKSC 56. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 9:34 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court of Appeal for British Columbia released a scathing judgment in Mide-Wilson v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
At Jost on Justice, Ken Jost notes the “poor reviews” for the court’s thin docket, but notes that “cases still in the pipeline may add to the interest and the legal stakes before the term ends next June. [read post]
Under such circumstances, as Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in his concurrence in Burson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 10:02 am
No problem, here is the 124th edition of Never Too Early For Christmas References Never Too Late.Festive Feline Level 100Rocket in the Patents Court: Napp Pharmaceutical v Dr Reddy's and SandozThe case of Napp Pharmaceutical Holdings Limited v (1) Dr Reddy's Laboratories (UK) Limited (2) Sandoz Limited [2016] EWCA Civ 1053 was previously reported on the IPKat here (first instance) and here (interim application). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 12:10 pm by Dennis Crouch
We have seen the Court take this approach recently in MGM Studios v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 11:53 am by Howard Knopf
Supreme Court of Canada justices have six months after they retire. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 7:26 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
Yesterday, the California Supreme Court began to address some of the unanswered questions in People v. [read post]
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will determine the validity of the EU Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) (Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillan Schrems) whilst the General Court of the EU will consider the future of Privacy Shield (La Quadrature du Net v Commission). [read post]