Search for: "United States v. Good"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 21,078
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Feb 2016, 1:09 pm
United States? [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:57 am
Lee, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, No. 15-326 I/P Engine, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 7:31 am
Michael Landon (“Little Joe Cartwright”) being served with a subpoena (1968) Another useful Townsend post addresses a common issue — the Government’s attempt to muzzle the recipients of subpoenas: In United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 4:19 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia charging MCC with one count of knowingly and willfully conspiring to commit major fraud on the United States. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 1:23 pm
It noted, quoting the United States Supreme Court in Bell v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 6:29 am
Woolsey’s decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 8:44 am
In Garcia v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 6:51 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:30 am
And for good reason. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:21 am
[Section 2(d) refusals to register the mark ECLIPSE for various goods relating to motion pictures and entertainment, in classes 9, 14, 18, 24, and 25, in view of, respectively, several class 9 registrations for the identical mark, a registration of the identical mark for watches in class 14, three registration in class 18 for ECLIPSE, ECLIPZE, and ECLIPS & Design, a class 24 registration of ECLIPSE for curtains, and a class 25 registration of the identical mark for footwear].February… [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm
Bank v. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 8:40 am
Article 1 states the purposes of the Charity Law. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 3:28 pm
The United State Supreme Court has struck down these government attempts to insulate scientific conclusions from cross examination from folks like me. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 8:08 am
Bartlett v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
But with one exception, the case law on the admissibility of electronic records and electronic discovery ignores them; see: R. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 3:07 am
Applicant conceded that its goods would not originate in the United States, and so the second prong of the test was met. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:15 am
As reported on the Hunton Employment Labor and Law Blog, on January 20, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Campbell-Ewald v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:28 am
” And for good reason. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 1:30 am
This leaves the situation with metatags unclear in the UK, but remains as insight into the application of IP rights in metatags for the time being.In the United States the question has not been answered definitely, with different Circuit Courts taking different approaches. [read post]