Search for: "mark"
Results 8841 - 8860
of 136,219
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2012, 10:56 am
While researching whether there are any new developments relating to section 21 of the UK Trade Marks Act 1994, the so-called "unjustified threats provision" (a friend and fiend of many UK trade mark practitioners), this Kat came across this information concerning an interesting new project by the Law Commission relating to unjustified threats in patent, trade mark and design litigation. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:32 am
Carl Oppedahl lost his case to register the mark “patents.com. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
[Refusal of the mark TWILIGHT for "candy, chewing gum" in view of the registered mark TWILIGHT DELIGHT for "chocolate bars"].The LETCO Group, LLC, Serial No. 77541687 (August 26, 2011) [not precedential]. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:28 pm
Here we are, Mark, entertain us. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:49 am
INTA is the International Trade Mark Association. [read post]
1 May 2009, 5:36 am
Case in point is The Mark Cuban Talking/ Dancing Doll. [read post]
4 May 2012, 9:00 am
"The America Invents Act (AIA) gives patentees a new option for effective patent marking: virtual marking via a website. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:52 am
He also announces 3 new lawyers joining the blogging team to replace Mark. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 11:54 am
More details about Mark and his campaign are here. [read post]
11 May 2009, 9:03 am
The Kat is happy to buy a pint of good old English ale, or an appropriate equivalent, for whichever person within WIPO tells him how the millionth mark was chosen, whether this was indeed the one millionth and, if not, which mark really was? [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 7:54 am
Will ASI no longer allow Specialized to use the mark? [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 10:00 am
Fisher maintained that the mark is merely descriptive of the goods, and the Board agreed. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm
It noted once again that when the goods are identical, a lesser degree of similarity is necessary to support a finding of likely confusion.As to the marks, the Board found that "most importantly" the marks are "distinctly different in meaning. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:15 am
A divided Board panel affirmed a refusal to register the collective membership mark STEELWORKERS for "indicating membership of a[n] (sic) labor organization," finding the mark highly descriptive of the membership of Applicant's organization, and Applicant's evidence of acquired distinctiveness insufficient to overcome the refusal. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:02 am
The person named by the mark is not connected with the activities performed by the applicant under the mark; and,4. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:44 am
An intra-family fracas regarding the service mark CAB CALLOWAY for retail music store and entertainment services was won by the late band leader's grandson, Christopher Brooks. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 10:46 pm
The statute doesn't say that the Statement of Use must be signed by the owner of the mark, just filed by the owner. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:21 am
The Board pointed out that this evidence does not show the strength or weakness of Applicant's mark in connection with its goods. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:08 am
" The Board therefore concluded that Petitioner failed to show that the phrase is generic.Acquired Distinctiveness: By asserting that its mark has acquired distinctiveness under Section 2(f), Respondent conceded that the mark is merely descriptive. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 1:28 am
"Applicant made bona fide commercial use of the mark through her advertising. [read post]
