Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 48,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2023, 9:26 am
Sepanossian v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 11:00 am
The Alice Corp. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:54 am
For example, those who incur the costs of creating an original work - e.g., the creators of a movie spend time writing a script, pay actors, rent studio space and the like - would not be able to recoup such costs if others were allowed to reproduce the work for no more than it costs to copy a DVD and then offer it to the marketplace at a price point that did not include all of the costs of the work's creation. [read post]
16 May 2016, 9:15 am
Take the case I read the other day, Goodrich v. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 6:06 am
Panagiotidis v. [read post]
19 May 2017, 4:08 am
Rather than speculating about how much aggregate licensing costs could be, costs should be measured by asking licensees what they are actually paying in cash royalties. [read post]
28 May 2015, 12:26 am
In Vialpando v. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:30 pm
Certified Neutraceuticals Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2021, 9:16 am
In 2008, the Colorado Supreme Court issued its decision in Goodyear v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 2:23 am
Carson and Others v The United Kingdom (Application no. 42184/05) The European Court of Human Rights has rejected a claim by British pensioners living abroad that their pension payments should be uplifted to take into account inflation. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 11:00 am
Bartold v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 4:44 am
Pay Up Sikalasinh v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 5:24 pm
In Atlantic Recording v. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 6:27 am
And when I channeled Frank Easterbrook, he referred me to Hill v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 7:48 pm
A third party may now be able to make a monetary calculation whether to infringe based on the economic cost of such infringement. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am
Legal costs were not a cost of “administering” the building: Stella House Ltd v Mears [1989] 1 EGLR 65, CA. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am
Legal costs were not a cost of “administering” the building: Stella House Ltd v Mears [1989] 1 EGLR 65, CA. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:46 am
This is Part V of my series on the relevance of the invention date in patent prosecution. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 4:30 am
It's Cruel. http://t.co/NaXa78aNWa -> Gallagher v. [read post]
