Search for: "DOES, 1-20" Results 8861 - 8880 of 27,636
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2015, 5:57 pm by Joy Waltemath
Although the proposed rule will be officially published Monday, April 20, it was made available in the public inspection portion of the Federal Register on April 16th. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:34 pm by Shea Denning
A Fourth Amendment seizure does not occur when an officer turns on her patrol vehicle’s lights and siren to signal for a vehicle to stop. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 7:09 am by Tony Bui
Sadly, this sentiment does not necessarily apply to condos in the city. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:05 pm
Google’s results, on the other hand, contained 20-25 duplicates, making its number closer to the mid 20s. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:00 am by Administrator
Accordingly, because the Final Order does not actually mandate that television service providers distribute a channel that broadcasts the Super Bowl, but instead simply imposes a condition on those that already do, its issuance was not authorized by s. 9(1) (h) of the Broadcasting Act. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 10:18 am by Dennis Crouch
  Of the 20 investigations resolved by settlement, 18 were settled prior to hearing and 2 subsequent to hearing. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 10:23 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
It is not the job of a court, when considering reasonableness, to “ask itself what the correct decision would have been (Law Society of New Brunswick v Ryan, 2003 SCC 20)”. [read post]
22 May 2024, 3:56 pm by Jessica Bayles
The Final Rule permits, but does not require, transmission providers to adopt a state agreement process. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 3:57 pm by Giles Peaker
Edwards v Kumarasamy [2015] EWCA Civ 20 Mr Edwards rented a second floor flat from Mr Kumarasamy. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 2:51 pm by Sarah Aberg and Pouneh Almasi
”[6] The Exchange Act provides a two-step test to assess whether a trading system meets the definition of an exchange: does the system bring together the orders for securities of multiple buyers and sellers; and does the system use established, non-discretionary methods (whether by providing a trading facility or by setting rules) under which such orders interact with each other, and the buyers and sellers entering such orders agree to the terms of the trade.[7]… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Q: Does estoppel help here? [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 1:58 pm by Ambrose Stearns, Jr.
The amount that is required is only that which is “undisputed”, meaning that amount which the insurer does not reasonably dispute is owed to the plaintiff. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:57 am by Eric
On June 8, 2005, the Caplins amended their complaint to add the following H-W students and their parents as defendants: (1) the Ryans and their son; (2) the Angelichs and their son; (3) the Ferreros and their son; (4) the Soleys and their son; (5) the Carleys and their son; (6) the Shapiros and their son; (7) H-W Does 1 through 50; (8) student Does 1 through 50; and (9) parent Does 1 through 100. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:26 am by Becky (Hyun Jeong) Baek
Schecter, as recently affirmed by the First Department: “[T]he signed, amended, and restated limited partnership agreement that is dated as of October 1 of 2016 [] does utterly refute the claims that are in this complaint in every regard. [read post]