Search for: "DOES ONE THROUGH ONE HUNDRED"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 9,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 8:22 am
There is, to begin with, Harry Markopolos' claim that many people in the financial world -- dozens, maybe even hundreds -- either knew or suspected that Bernard Madoff was a fraud. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 10:37 pm
A violation of § 1798.79(a is punishable "by imprisonment in a county jail for up to one year, a fine of not more than one thousand five hundred dollars . . . or both". [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 10:04 am
" Does the Congress routinely delegate some spending authority to executive branch agencies? [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:16 am
But that does not make it less ethical. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 3:23 pm
Fifty-three hundred people live here. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Unlike Rule 23(b)(3), 23(b)(2) does not require that class members receive “opt-out” rights. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 10:25 am
Also, if it does need to be stopped, how can it be done? [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 8:33 am
(Cross-posted from Opinio Juris.)Two hundred years of Lincoln, February 12, 1809. ... what, if anything, does that Lincoln fellow, the rural rube from the wild edges of the American frontier, have to do with international law? [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 2:57 pm
The registries are diluted with hundreds of thousands of people that pose no risk to anyone. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 7:41 pm
One question I do have – does anyone really think these letters are useful? [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 10:12 am
The 10DA checker does not even automatically select to view similar matches, meaning that the initial display only includes one or two copies of the work in question. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 3:00 am
That virtually identical doctor-slander case was decided one-hundred and seventy-one years ago, long enough ago that calling a doctor a "bleeder" -- one who treated by bleeding the patient -- was a sufficiently accepted practice that it wasn't defamatory to accuse a doctor of being a "bleeder. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:40 pm
If he doesn't care for the schoolhouse gates analogy anymore, let him come up with a better one. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 5:15 am
When the client asked to see the actual opinion, his request was refused, with a letter arriving two days later demanding full payment of the £2,105.55 otherwise immediate steps would be taken to recover the funds.After a little checking by the client, directly with the Advocate, it has been discovered the QC who was supposed to have given Counsel's opinion on the boundary dispute, had never actually undertaken the work, nor even given the first Counsel's opinion the solicitor had… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:02 pm
It is one of the most important documents you will ever sign, and may be one of the best bargains you will ever have. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 10:52 am
It may be unlikely that you will have to sue to enforce your copyright, but if it does happen you will want to put a stop to the infringement right away, without having to wait months for your registration to make its way through the Copyright Office. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 8:04 am
Nor does the MSM have the faintest idea of another salient fact. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 9:01 pm
Insite's ability to operate was dependent upon this exemption, and it was set to expire in just one month. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 5:03 pm
The restatement does not specify the seller’s role in the chain of distribution or the extent of a particular seller’s control over the product. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 9:45 pm
A classic example is an experimental new drug -- the FDA approval process will often take 7 to 10 years or more and the costs of clinical trials in the various phases can run through a hundred million dollars. [read post]
