Search for: "Grant v. State" Results 8861 - 8880 of 68,544
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2021, 2:36 pm by Geoff Schweller
The letter notes that the Supreme Court’s unanimous ruling in Digital Realty v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 2:09 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This was a real concern at the time because the CRA was adopted in 1996, before United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 12:34 pm by Jon L. Gelman
No adjournment shall be granted unless there is found to be good cause. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:36 am by Chukwuma Okoli
For example, Order 9 Rule 5 of the Lagos State High Court Civil Procedure Rules provides that upon an application by a claimant, a judge may grant an order for substituted service as it may seem just. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court ruling in each action, said that "When a party moves to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action, not whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action," citing Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court ruling in each action, said that "When a party moves to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action, not whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action," citing Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 4:33 pm by Kevin Sheerin
After the hearing, the Commission will determine whether or not to grant your appeal. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 4:09 am by Brett Holubeck
The Court found that granting unions access for up to 3 hours per day for 120 days per year was a taking and the employers should have been compensated. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 3:09 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Contrary to the Kletzkin defendants’ contention, the complaint adequately states a cause of action to recover damages for violation of Judiciary Law § 487. [read post]