Search for: "In re Richard A"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 10,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2008, 11:15 am
So, like anybody would under the circumstances, we re-evaluated our goals. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:08 pm
To argue that the right to buy pursuant to a s.122 notice is lost when the tenancy is determined by a possession order and that it cannot be retrospectively re-instated by the retrospective revival of the tenancy produces unacceptable results under s.122(2) and flys in the face of s.122(1) (’obliged to give up possession’). [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
By Richard Koman with Caitlin M. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 6:05 pm
(And yes, Wikipedia refused to take down this time - but that does not mean they always would, or that all other sites would act in the same way.)As Richard Clayton has pointed out in the past, international co-operation now means that foreign phishing sites can usually b [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:28 pm
You need Help: So you owe the IRS, but you're not sure where to turn? [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Lee Richards of Richards, Kibbe & Orbe will be the court-appointed receiver for Madoff's company, according to The Am Law Daily, which notes that Richards served as the court-appointed monitor in the Computer Associates case. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:53 am
We're just lawyers here at the Glom, so perhaps we will simply point you to some economists. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 12:46 pm
Also helping put some perspective on matters is an interview with Richard Foster, a McKinsey director for over 20 years and coauthor of Creative Destruction: Why Companies That Are Built to Last Underperform the Market--and How to Successfully Transform Them. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Colombia Colombian trade marks just got a little slower (IP tango) Croatia Simplified process for renewing customs watch applications, from 1 January 2009 (Class 46) Europe European Court of Justice rules on genuine use in Austrian charity reference: Verein Radetzky-Orden v Bundesvereinigung Kameradschaft ‘Feldmarschall Radetzky’ (Class 46) (IPKat) CFI decides BARBARA BECKER confusingly similar to earlier Community trade mark BECKER covering… [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 1:45 am
B) The result of Cisco's stubbornness to bend to the will of the bearded godfather of open source, Richard Stallman. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 3:06 pm
12-11-2008 Ohio:Saying that evicting former owners and tenants during winter weather and a recession is "heartless," Butler County, Ohio sheriff Richard Jones has become the third sheriff this year to refuse to process some eviction orders. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
"Orrick's case was strong and we're happy Bill Hoisington's character and reputation have been preserved," she said in a statement. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 2:44 am
Wesselhoff, Licensed Builders Shed Consumer Protection Claims [reporting on the Michigan Supreme Court's decision in Liss v Lewiston-Richards] Leslee M. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:03 pm
They're careful, however, not to call for consumers to be required to authenticate themselves. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 2:13 pm
I'm Richard Close and I was a "Hitman" for the IRS. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 10:04 pm
Jessep: You’re damn right I did! [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
But two notorious citizens of the Yellowhammer State--former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy and former Alabama governor Don Siegelman--are counting on an Atlanta-based appellate panel for salvation. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 2:14 am
While the public comments to the OMB are not yet available on the web site, we've posted some of them here: Boundy letter 1 - reversal on ‘new ground' in examiner's answer burden of proof 081110 2330 FINAL 1.pdf Boundy letter 2 re PTO failure to consider alternatives 081113 FINAL.1.pdf Boundy letter 3 - falsified certifications 081113 FINAL.pdf Boundy letter 4 re ambiguity in change… [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
"Even if you know you're in a bubble, it's extremely difficult to get out," said Posner. [read post]
8 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
They're arguing that Discover not only doesn't have to pay Morgan Stanley its share of the settlement but that Morgan Stanley owes Discover damages for its interference in the antitrust case. [read post]
