Search for: "Obama" Results 8861 - 8880 of 102,310
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2017, 3:00 am by Christopher Tyner
  A New York Times article says that presidents typically are advised not to comment on pending criminal cases because doing so opens the door to arguments that the defendant will not receive a fair trial, but the story notes several instances where former presidents, including Nixon, Bush (43), and Obama, have commented on pending cases. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia stopped the implementation of an Obama-era regulation that would increase fuel efficiency and emissions standards for truck trailers. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 1:03 pm
" That's by Steven Rattner, "who served as counselor to the Treasury secretary in the Obama administration, is a Wall Street executive and a contributing opinion writer. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 1:01 pm by Gail Jankowski
In so doing, Trump rejected a last minute personal appeal from Obama-appointed CFPB head Richard Cordray to save the rule. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 10:25 am by NCC Staff
” Since taking office, President Trump has followed through on some of his campaign promises, signing various Executive Orders aimed at undoing previous Executive Orders issued by President Obama. [read post]
President Trump still has not made good on his campaign promise to send bad hombres to Guantanamo, but thanks to a remarkable series of recent events, military detention of enemy combatants is back in the headlines anyways. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Harry Larson
(According to researchers with the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at the University of Syracuse, the Obama administration issued 85,720 detainers in Fiscal Year 2016. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Mark Nevitt
” This is, in my estimation, the most difficult issue, as numerous transgender service members relied upon the earlier Obama-era guidance that allowed open transgender service. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” That review may recommend changing modernization plans and force sizes inherited from the Obama Administration to reflect the Trump Administration’s priorities for nuclear forces or to shift resources to address other defense priorities in the face of long-term budgetary pressures. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 9:53 am
She was nominated by President Obama and confirmed by the Senate as the 27th Public Printer of the United States. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 8:59 am by Garrett Hinck
The plan, developed under President Obama, would accumulate the costs over a 30-year period. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 7:30 am by Scott Harman
Obama, the court held that “an individual’s actual incarceration is insufficient to show that [he] lack[s] access to the courts. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am by Bruce Ackerman
How, then, could Obama claim that the AUMF justified the initiation of hostilities against the Islamic State two months later? [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 4:00 am by Scott Anderson, Sabrina McCubbin
Johnson noted that limits on ground troops were discussed in 2015, when the senate considered President Obama’s request for a new AUMF. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Unfortunately, they seem to have gotten it from the Supreme Court.In order to accommodate religious objections, the Obama administration exempted churches and other religious organizations from the obligation under the Affordable Care Act and its implementing regulations to provide employees with health insurance that covers contraception. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 5:18 pm by Steve Shiffrin
President Obama in his 2010 State of the Union Address worried that the Court would go that far: "With all due deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that, I believe, will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 12:41 pm by Ilya Somin
United States (2012), the Supreme Court rejected the Obama administration’s dubious argument that temporary flooding of property by the government can never qualify as a taking. [read post]