Search for: "Q" Results 8861 - 8880 of 22,042
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2015, 6:00 am
Our next “Q & A Forum” will take place this Friday, May 1, 2015. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 3:26 am by Broc Romanek
The damage wrought by poorly reported stories in Rolling Stone magazine & others has taught the media nothing… There have been a number of questions posed in our “Q&A Forum” on conflict minerals reporting (eg. #8413; 8402). [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 1:18 am by J
After all, they are public authorities themselves (Weaver v L&Q [2009] EWCA Civ 587) and public authorities do not have human rights. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 5:00 pm by Old Fox
id=UnpnlYZOks0C&pg=RA1-PR11&lpg=RA1-PR11&dq=hugh+rodham+serial+set+report&source=bl&ots=c8mcmVMwls&sig=kTV0imBwSNAhPHpF6c1QS-7C0L8&hl=en&sa=X&ei=aY46VYu3DYW6ggS1oIGwDg&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=hugh%20rodham%20serial%20set%20report&f=false [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 7:28 am by Jim Slaughter
For today’s blog on one of the most misused parliamentary motions (“to Table”), here’s a Q&A from “Notes and Comments on Robert’s Rules of Order, Fourth Edition”: HOW IS THE MOTION TO LAY ON THE TABLE MISUSED? [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 7:28 am by Jim Slaughter
For today’s blog on one of the most misused parliamentary motions (“to Table”), here’s a Q&A from “Notes and Comments on Robert’s Rules of Order, Fourth Edition”: HOW IS THE MOTION TO LAY ON THE TABLE MISUSED? [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:48 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, J.D., Ph.D.
  Agenda Note: All keynote, plenary, and panel sessions will include time for Q & A. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
The conviction was based on the italicized portion of a statement (by Bonds) made in response to a question (by a federal prosecutor) during an investigative grand jury proceeding regarding a steroid ring with which Bonds was allegedly involved: Q. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 6:38 pm by Jon Markman
TVBD user identifications aren’t much better: “Sue Q. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:42 am by SHG
And endless is the sort of list that brings a smile to a prosecutor’s face, as reflected in AUSA Merry Jean Chan’s response at oral argument: Q: I think it’s a common experience among all of us on the appellate court to ask of the lawyer in front of us in a criminal case that’s come up on appeal: “Counsel, could you please explain to me what happened at trial? [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 6:37 pm
"Tsarnaev's Defense Tries to Recast Obscene Gesture": Katharine Q. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 3:37 pm
Q: Right.A: That’s what keeps our friendship. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 2:20 pm by Kristina Corbitt
The event was an overwhelming success – a fast-paced hour of back and forth Q&A between us and members of the LexBlog Network. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 12:38 pm by tjsllibrary
Each presentation will be followed by a Q&A session to discuss the topic in depth. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 9:30 am by Joanna Herzik
For Random Profiles, we randomly pick one of our 96,000-plus attorneys and do a Q&A. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 8:29 am by SHG
Q: How is it possible he ended up dead with a severed spine? [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 10:01 pm by James Andrews
Impact of new trade agreements on FSMA import rules When Huffman opened up the Q&A to questions from the audience, the first came from Food & Water Watch senior lobbyist Tony Corbo, who asked how FDA’s import agenda will be impacted by an increase in imports from two new free trade agreements — the Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. [read post]