Search for: "S. et al"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 29,020
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2009, 11:30 am
A., et al. (1997). [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:59 am
., et al., 430 B.R. 99 (Bankr. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 8:00 am
RSPS Holdings, et al., Civil Action No. 5:24-cv-00049) seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief.In addition to the cash pay-out, the company has agreed to modify its anti-harassment and anti-retaliation policies and will provide the EEOC with reports of future complaints.In a written statement, Marcus G. [read post]
9 Aug 2007, 5:51 am
., et al., Your Business in Court—2006, 62 Food & Drug L.J. 305 (2007).In its annual review of “Your Business in Court,” the Food and Drug Law Journal authors took note of three CAFA-related matters. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:47 am
Nicome, et al., 11A36121. filed in the DeKalb County State Court. [read post]
3 Sep 2008, 12:30 pm
AT&T Mobility, LLC, et al., 2008 WL 2130436, No. 08 C 416 (N.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 7:57 am
Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy LLP, et al., No. 07 Civ. 10688 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Terumo Cardiovascular Systems et al – United States District Court – District of Utah – August 7th, 2017) involves an action against a hospital and a manufacturer of a heart/lung bypass machine. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 7:41 am
The Raymond Corporation et al – United States District Court – Northern District of Georgia – January 11th, 2019) involves a products liability action. [read post]
1 May 2013, 11:42 am
County of Placer, et al. (2013) 215 Cal.App.4th 25, ordered published onApril 2, 2013, the Third District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment entered after sustaining a demurrer to a CEQA action without leave on statute of limitations grounds and denying plaintiffs’ Code of Civil Procedure § 473 motion seeking relief based on mistake or excusable neglect. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 1:51 pm
., et al., the court determined that among other things, the former employees’ used confidential information and trade secrets they obtained during their employment to solicit more than twenty-five of their former employer’s more profitable clients. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 6:04 am
AT&T Mobility LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 09-1007-LPS (D.Del., December 30, 2016), the Court granted defendants Telecommunication Systems, Inc., Networks in Motion, Inc., and Cellco Partnership (collectively, the “TCS Defendants”) motion for partial summary judgment of no willful infringement and denied a number of other motions to exclude and motions for summary judgment or partial summary judgment filed by the parties. [read post]
2 May 2008, 10:45 am
., et al., No. 08-CV-36102 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 11:30 am
HTC Corporation, et al.- United States District Court – Eastern District of Virginia – March 15th, 2017) involves a claim of trademark infringement. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
Dapper Labs, Inc et al., a federal judge declined to dismiss a class action complaint alleging securities law violations, finding that the Plaintiffs plausibly alleged that the non-fungible tokens (NFTs) sold on the NBA’s Top Shot platform could be securities. [read post]
24 May 2023, 3:37 am
LLC et al, Apache and others acquired an oil and gas lease on 100,000+ acres in the Texas Panhandle. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 11:32 am
Price et al – United States District Court – District of Colorado – September 24th, 2015) involves a chase, and subsequent killing, of a dog-at-large. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 11:34 am
Houston County Health Care Authority et al – United States District Court – Middle District of Alabama – June 11th 2015) involves a challenge to plaintiff’s dermatology expert witness testimony by the defendant. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 5:00 am
The Amicus filed by CII, TIAA-CREF, et al, brings this point home. [read post]
1 May 2012, 5:10 pm
HBO et al. are kissing up to cable. [read post]
