Search for: "Sayed v. Page"
Results 8861 - 8880
of 12,186
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Book's web page here. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 5:33 am
During the criminal trial, plaintiff posted certain comments on his Facebook page stating that he was `still’ on jury duty. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:00 am
In Cohen v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 8:16 pm
[footnote omitted] (original emphasis)Thereafter his Honour referred to the use of the word “knowingly” in civil proceedings with particular reference to that word in relation to the tort of deceit as discussed by the High Court in Magill v Magill (2006) 231 ALR 27. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 10:40 pm
That approach was adopted by Strickland J in Parker v Parker [2010] FamCA 664 (3 August 2010). [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 7:53 pm
As but one example of the concerns to which I refer, Ceci and Bruck, presenting the Amicus Brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. [read post]
19 Feb 2011, 1:03 pm
That ruling is directly contrary to Al-Bihani v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 9:08 pm
A substantive challenge to a § 112 ¶ 1 rejection points out support in the specification for the claim: the claim says x, and the specification supports x at page y.The Board has held on many occasions that when the examiner does a procedurally-incomplete job of examination, the ambiguity and incompleteness deprives the Board of justiciable ability to decide an appeal.[10]That’s the legal minimum. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 8:36 am
We don't know if that's what led the Texas Supreme Court to accept review of Texas Rice Land Partners, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 1:07 pm
It is impossible to know for sure, but it is reasonable to assume that the 1000+ page IDS Kappos referred to might be in response to what the Supreme Court will likely do. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:41 pm
Earlier today, Judge Slomsky issued a 142 page decision vacating the jury verdict that had held 4 PADEP employees in the Northeast Regional Office personally liable for $6.5 million in a claim filed by MFS, Inc. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 10:36 am
Starting with Moran v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 9:22 am
By Eric Goldman Herman v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 7:10 am
” (That apparently refers to the PACER page numbers and not the internal document page numbers, since the quoted accusations of sexual misconduct were on PACER page 14.) [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:40 am
[The statistics junkies amongst you will be interested to hear that it contains a little over 46,000 words, split elegantly into 376 numbered paragraphs on 103 pages. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 2:21 am
"This case UK's Intellectual Property Office says: "If you would like to comment on this case please e-mail policy@ipo.gsi.gov.uk before 21 February 2011". [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 7:47 pm
” A board cannot “just say no” to a tender offer. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 4:04 pm
See page 8 (Prof. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
Says who? [read post]
