Search for: "State v. Whited" Results 8861 - 8880 of 13,216
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2012, 9:49 am by boston
”Americans United filed a friend-of-the-court brief in this case, Sherman v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
RumsfeldDocket: 11-1277Issue(s): Whether federal officials responsible for the torture of an American citizen on American soil may be sued for damages under the Constitution.Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (4th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionReply of petitioners White v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 6:51 pm by Matt Cameron
Massachusetts was the first jurisdiction in the U.S. to recognize full marriage equality6 at the state level in 2004’s historic Goodridge v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 7:20 am by Ilya Somin
Texas has stated that it considers black and Latino students “under-represented” at the university, based in part on their proportions in the state population. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:57 am by Mary L. Dudziak
Thus, this article argues that Sweatt set the stage for Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
Thus, this article argues that Sweatt set the stage for Brown v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 3:00 am by Steve Lombardi
Norwood White Coal Co., 229 Iowa 496, 502, 294 N.W. 741, 744 (1940) (stating “injury arises out of t [read post]
29 May 2012, 6:53 am by Frank Pasquale
A recent Google white paper by Eugene Volokh and Donald Falk has buttressed Eric Goldman‘s and Christopher Yoo‘s rationales for unfettered discretion in the exercise of search engines’ editorial judgment. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:46 pm by Michael O'Hear
 The second began in 2005, when the Supreme Court overturned the de novo standard on constitutional grounds in United States v. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:08 pm by David Bernstein
And as near as I can tell, the University of Texas-Austin undergraduate college, which is currently defending its affirmative action program before the Supreme Court in Fisher v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 12:26 pm
the judge stated that there had only been a single use: on the website. [read post]