Search for: "Still v. Justice Court" Results 8861 - 8880 of 19,630
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2019, 4:05 am by SHG
Parsing the Supreme Court’s opinion in Kisor v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 5:57 am by Aaron Tang
Today’s discussion returns to Williams v. [read post]
28 Mar 2015, 6:46 pm
 Last month, the Supreme Court denied certiorari in New Mexico v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Thus, for example, Justice Thomas (in his concurrence in United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:09 am by Kiran Bhat
As Conor noted yesterday, reactions to the Court’s recent decision in Brown v. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 3:52 am by CMS
The case was heard by a bench of five Justices on 28 June 2018. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 12:22 pm
  Althought the Justices do occupy a different position in the federal court system, the lower-court judges may still take their cues from the Justices in deciding how to value different judicial activites. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 11:09 am
Today's the day that many pharmaceutical patent term extension-watchers have been waiting for with feelings of optimism or anxiety: the day on which the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) delivered its ruling in Case C‑577/13, Actavis Group PTC EHF, Actavis UK Ltd v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. [read post]
21 Oct 2024, 8:05 pm by Béligh Elbalti
However, if, one of the parties still brings the case before Bahraini courts despite such an agreement, the issue extends beyond merely honoring the agreement to a broader issue dependent solely on how Bahraini courts assess their own jurisdiction. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am by Adam Baker
Reasoning Justice Iacobucci delivered the unanimous judgment of the Court (Chief Justice Lamer and Justices Cory, McLachlin, Major, Bastarache and Binnie also sat for the appeal). [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 1:39 pm by Eduardo Penalver
 One avenue, which 5 justices seemed to embrace in Eastern Enterprises v. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:22 am by ASAD KHAN
The Justices decided that a second human rights claim does not without more automatically trigger a right of appeal. [read post]