Search for: "Strong v. State" Results 8861 - 8880 of 16,401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course, STARBUCKS. [read post]
Rather, the Court reasoned that there is a strong presumption in favor of retroactivity, Dynamex only clarifies existing law, and that California state courts provide no indication of an intention to limit Dynamex to new cases. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:56 pm
It is to a consideration of those changes as well as the strong underlying lines of continuity that this short essay will focus. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 1:20 pm by Giles Peaker
I regret to state that I did not believe him. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am by Juan C. Antúnez
 As noted by Judge Warner’s strong dissent in the linked-to case above: The right to marry is a fundamental right, protected by the United States Constitution. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:50 am by familoo
You have to know what is right for them and be strong enough to try to make it happen. [read post]