Search for: "U.S. v. Mark" Results 8861 - 8880 of 11,356
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Nov 2010, 7:07 am by Lyle Denniston
  It made no difference, the Circuit Court concluded, that Harper had not seen those marks when she chose to download the songs. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am by By Adam Wahlberg
Look for these professionals who have been listed to Super Lawyers to make an appearance before the U.S. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
  The paper, prepared for a recent conference at Western New England College School of Law marking the 35th anniversary of the Massachusetts Supreme Court's landmark ruling in Wilkes v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
” As of today the U.S. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 5:16 am by christopher
Jan.26, 1995)) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also Brown v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by cap95
As the House will convene next week to consider whether to censure Charles Rangel of New York, we've also posted (after the jump) a fully-online marked up version of Cheryl's guide: Ethics Developments in the U.S. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am by Richard Goldfarb
  Indeed, a patent to refine potash into pearl ash, which is basically pure potassium carbonate, was patent no. 1 (now X1) issued by the U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 9:02 pm by Patent Docs
Promote Innovation LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 6:09 am
The lawsuit sought cancellation of the Las Vegas hotel's licence to use the marks. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 2:21 pm by Albert Wan
 Wiggins, 539 U.S. at 521 (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]