Search for: "mark" Results 8861 - 8880 of 136,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2012, 2:32 am by John L. Welch
Aren't they also relevant to the issue of the degree of descriptiveness of the COACH marks? [read post]
A Puerto Rican chicken company abandoned its mark because it stopped using it for five years and never could offer any evidence of an intent to resume use. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 7:52 am by Steve Baird
But, what if the applied-for mark were FRANCIS FORD COPPOLA GIA for wine, is there room on the shelf for that one at the USPTO? [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 7:16 am by admin
Complainant obtained a registered mark in Panama in May 2010. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:25 am by John L. Welch
The Board sustained this petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark BIO1ONE for "fertilizers and soil amendments for agricultural use," finding it likely to cause confusion with the earlier-used mark BIO-ONE for the identical goods. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Any attempt to make sense of the combination of terms in the mark would require complex, multistage mental process. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
The USPTO issued a Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark THE LEATHER + VINYL DOCTOR for "furniture restoration, repair and maintenance" [LEATHER + VINYL disclaimed], finding it likely to cause confusion with the registered mark LEATHER & VINYL MD & Design for "leather and vinyl cleaning and repair services; upholstery cleaning and repair services" [LEATHER & VINYL disclaimed]. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 3:41 am by John L. Welch
Applicant sought to register the mark AUTO BY RENT & Design for "automobile dealerships," but Opposer claimed likelihood of confusion with its mark AUTO-BY-TEL for various vehicle-related services, including "referrals in the field of automobile and truck sales and leasing. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 9:39 am
  Primary legislation may indeed be the only way to clarify precisely the extent of trade mark protection in many Community and European Union national trade mark registrations and applications. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 4:54 am by Alfred Brophy
Mark Brandon’s new book, however, challenges these claims. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 8:57 am by Tiffany Blofield
Buffet opposed the application on the basis of a likelihood of confusion between the applied for mark “Marijuanaville” and his well-known MARGARITAVILLE® registered mark. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:29 am by John L. Welch
The Board affirmed a Section 2(a) refusal to register the bottle design shown below, for various beverages, on the ground that the mark "would be regarded as vulgar by a substantial composite of the general public, and therefore the mark is scandalous or immoral. [read post]
16 May 2008, 4:15 am
The Board sustained a Section 2(d) opposition brought by the successor to Mueller's, finding Barilla's mark likely to cause confusion with Opposer's common law mark AMERICA'S FAVORITE PASTA for the same goods. [read post]
19 Feb 2020, 2:20 pm by Dennis Crouch
  The marking requirement only applies to patentees practicing the invention via a “patented article. [read post]