Search for: "A P.2."
Results 8881 - 8900
of 26,630
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Oct 2017, 11:47 pm
En definitiva el legislador, junto con la finalidad de preservación del interés público que protege la ejecución de sentencias urbanísticas en cuanto instrumento dirigido al restablecimiento de la realidad física alterada, ha tratado de introducir la defensa y protección por parte del órgano judicial de los intereses privados de aquellos que habiendo adquirido de buena fe, pueden resultar perjudicados por tal ejecución, si bien,… [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 9:30 pm
The Usefulness—and Possible Dangers—of Machine Learning October 2, 2017 | Eric Schlabs, The Regulatory Review The first Optimizing Government workshop held at the University of Pennsylvania Law School last year demystified machine learning, explaining its functionality, potential, and limitations, while also considering its potential for unfair outcomes. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 1:30 pm
Joseph P. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
P. 8(a)(2) and stating, `[n]either this court nor the district court is required to create Payne's claim for her’); cf. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 11:37 am
Op. at p. 12. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 6:50 am
Misconception 2: I can wait to hire a lawyer. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 5:14 am
McBride, 539 P.2d 1006, 1012 (N.M. 1975); State ex rel. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:10 am
Firemark.Entertainment Law Offices of Gordon P. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:21 am
” Given a $14 price point for Fetzer’s wine, the court found that “[p]urchasers of a premium red zinfandel, therefore, are expected to exercise a high degree of care and are not likely to make mistakes as to a product’s sponsorship or affiliation. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:21 am
” Given a $14 price point for Fetzer’s wine, the court found that “[p]urchasers of a premium red zinfandel, therefore, are expected to exercise a high degree of care and are not likely to make mistakes as to a product’s sponsorship or affiliation. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 9:11 am
Some state laws, though, may restrict employers from retaliating for their employees’ political activity; some apply only to off-the-job speech, but others might apply to on-the-job speech as well (see p. 304). [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:43 am
P. 97(a). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:28 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 2:28 pm
Id. at *2. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 4:03 pm
Table 2 reports crimes both as numbers and rate for the states and regions for 2015, 2016, and the percent change. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 11:44 am
Por otra parte, el Presidente Senatorial indicó que el Senado trabajará en horario especial de 9:00 a.m. a 2:00 p.m. durante la emergencia y hasta tanto se normalice la situación en Puerto Rico. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 9:49 pm
I have done hundreds of homelessness reviews and always used 2 books. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:32 pm
Standing is a threshold jurisdictional issue that requires the plaintiffs to show that they have (1) suffered an injury in fact, (2) that is fairly traceable to the challenged conduct of the defendants, and (3) that is likely to be redressed by a favorable judicial decision. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 2:45 am
Neither bill is in circulation today. 2. [read post]
23 Sep 2017, 2:38 pm
By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Leonard P. [read post]
