Search for: "GROUP v. STATE"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 37,545
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 11:10 am
Home Group Ltd was followed by the Lands Tribunal in Chand v Calmore Area Housing Ltd (LRX/170/2007). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 11:10 am
Home Group Ltd was followed by the Lands Tribunal in Chand v Calmore Area Housing Ltd (LRX/170/2007). [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
Another RSL 'starter tenancy' and s.21 case, albeit one that marginally pre-dated West Kent HA v Haycraft, is The Riverside Group Limited - v - Sharon Thomas [2012] EWHC 169 (QB) 2 March 2012 (Manchester District Registry) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
Another RSL 'starter tenancy' and s.21 case, albeit one that marginally pre-dated West Kent HA v Haycraft, is The Riverside Group Limited - v - Sharon Thomas [2012] EWHC 169 (QB) 2 March 2012 (Manchester District Registry) [Not on Bailii. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
(Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm
(Citing Sierra Club v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 9:54 am
V. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Therefore, at this stage, dismissal was not warranted under CPLR 3211(a)(7), or under CPLR 3211(a)(1), as defendant failed to provide documentary evidence that “conclusively establishes a defense to the asserted claims as a matter of law” (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]; Amsterdam Hospitality Group, LLC v Marshall-Alan Assoc., Inc., 120 AD3d 431, 432-433 [1st Dept 2014])” [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:36 pm
United States, when it held: "When a fragmented Court decides a case and no single rationale explaining the result enjoys the assent of five Justices, 'the holding of the Court may be viewed as that position taken by those Members who concurred in the judgments on the narrowest grounds.'" In United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 8:59 am
If the scope of federal regulation is limited, plaintiffs and advocacy groups may shift their efforts toward claims in state courts, especially in areas such as the environment and labor and employment. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am
The Associated Press (via the San Francisco Chronicle and the Washington Post) reports on the amicus briefs in support of the university filed, respectively, by the leaders of the University of California system and by fourteen states, while Reuters reports on the involvement of Asian-American groups in the case. [read post]
21 Oct 2022, 9:11 pm
The 36 U.S. states suing Google, Epic, and the consumer plaintiffs brought that motion, and Match Group (Tinder) has since joined.Google is now opposing Epic's and Match Group's motions to amend their complaints:Public redacted version of Google's opposition to Epic's Match's motion to amend complaintsThere are two kinds of arguments here. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:01 pm
That is why the Supreme Court’s failure to make clear the standard of review it was applying in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 9:00 am
The decision in Pacter v. [read post]
8 Sep 2008, 5:40 pm
Bernard Hodes Group can be found here. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 2:04 am
By Sara PulsState v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 4:40 pm
[Post by Venkat] Asis Internet Servs. v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:48 pm
" As stated in Alice v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 7:48 pm
" As stated in Alice v. [read post]
