Search for: "Grant Connect" Results 8881 - 8900 of 21,859
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2017, 8:21 am
 The particular dispute arose in connection with a Democratic caucus held in Nevada during the 2016 campaign. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 6:56 am by Eric Turkewitz
To those conservatives that read this blog, I urge you to re-read our Declaration (and Bill of Rights) and ask yourselves why it is that, for this issue, principles of smaller and less powerful government have fallen by the wayside in favor of granting governmental protections and immunities. [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 4:30 am by Alex Potcovaru
In the decision, the Court ruled that the government could not block those with a “bona fide” familial, educational, or occupational connection with an American entity from entry under the travel ban, although the precise definition of who could claim a family connection went unspecified. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:46 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
If the DOL argued against the preliminary injunction (i.e., for its reversal), the Fifth Circuit might order that the 2016 revisions become effective, whether retrospectively or at some point in the future, in connection with a holding that the district court’s order was entirely unsalvageable. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 9:30 am
  On its final day, the Court announced that it would grant review in two cases challenging President Trump’s travel ban. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
 Specifically, the Board of Appeal held that SPCs are rights that are strictly connected to the basic patent in that they are aimed at extending its duration. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 6:18 am
 Specifically, the Board of Appeal held that SPCs are rights that are strictly connected to the basic patent in that they are aimed at extending its duration. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 1:43 am by Stephen Pitel
  But on the facts of this case they determine that the injunction should not have been granted, for several reasons. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 2:29 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The lesson here is employers should not take personal jurisdiction for granted, particularly when defending claims brought by residents and nonresidents of a forum state where there is no general jurisdiction. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:28 pm by John Eastman
Abbasi, for example, decided June 19 by a really short-staffed 4-2 vote (Justices Elena Kagan and Sonia Sotomayor were recused, and Justice Neil Gorsuch was not yet on the court when the case was heard), the Supreme Court held that a Bivens remedy was not available for constitutional violations alleged to have been committed by federal officials (including the attorney general) in the wake of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, against several immigrants from Middle-Eastern countries connected… [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:53 am by Jennifer Weisberg Millner
Janet Sacklow retained counsel to represent her in connection with various issues surrounding her child’s gender identity issues. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 4:53 am by Jennifer Weisberg Millner
Janet Sacklow retained counsel to represent her in connection with various issues surrounding her child’s gender identity issues. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Supreme Court for review, and rather than receiving a simple grant of review, she received a final ruling on the merits without ever having to brief or argue the case. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:31 pm by Jules M. Haas
I have represented many individuals in connection with Surrogate’s Court litigation and the disqualification of an executor or administrator. [read post]
A provisional authority to operate from JAB indicates the CSP has met FedRAMP requirements and may be used Government-wide; individual agencies may grant authority to operate on the basis of the provisional authority to operate from JAB. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:11 pm by Lorraine Fleck
Google then sought the Supreme Court of Canada’s permission to appeal which was subsequently granted. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:01 am by Joy Waltemath
In July 2013, the EEOC issued a right-to-sue letter in connection with his second charge and he filed this suit alleging Neiman Marcus unlawfully interfered with his ADA rights. [read post]