Search for: "High v State" Results 8881 - 8900 of 35,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2019, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
Answer: As he did earlier this term with Frank v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:59 am by Giesela Ruehl
These features should be understood in the Chinese contexts of high-level data localization and Internet censorship. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
On the same day, Richard Spearman QC (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) handed down judgment in the case of Otuo v The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society[2019] EWHC 1349 (QB) (heard 1-14 and 25 to 29 March and 1 April 2019). [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 11:27 am by Jon Roland
US v Hudson 1812 correctly decided that the Constitution did not authorize Congress to define and punish common law crimes. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  And even if Steve Calabresi is correct, as discussed in an earlier post, that at present Democrats control six of the twelve smallest states, it is also demonstrably true that these states are increasingly unrepresentative of the rich pluralism and multi-culturalism that typify the larger states. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am by Joel R. Brandes
Corp. v. 2319 Richmond Terrace Corp., 141 A.D.3d 626, 627, 34 N.Y.S.3d 616).Oral promise to pay credit card bills during the pendency of action unenforceable            In Novick v Novick, ‑‑‑ N.Y.S.3d ‑‑‑‑, 2019 WL 2202438 (Mem), 2019 N.Y. [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 7:38 am by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Mississippi Supreme Court Resolves First Impression Question in Capital Case Involving a Juvenile The high court in Moore v. [read post]