Search for: "JOHN DOE (1)"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 14,611
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 May 2012, 1:53 pm
Does 1-37, has severed as to all defendants except John Doe #1, and granted discovery as to John Doe #1.Report and recommendation severing as to John Does 2-11Order granting discovery as to John Doe #1 only[Ed. note. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:58 am
Now these next words hurt, but they must be said: Broward does it right (ouch) and Dade does not. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:52 pm
The measure takes effect Aug. 1. [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:03 pm
John Edwards. [read post]
30 May 2012, 2:02 pm
Conversely, a relatively small company may need the protection of MR 1.7(a)(1) to ensure that its firm does not take a directly adverse representation against it when Microsoft or Google comes calling. [read post]
30 May 2012, 8:02 am
Does it matter? [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:22 am
EMILY ANN MORRIS; UNITED FINANCIAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and JOHN DOES 1-6, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:05 am
(AA p. 053, lns. 1-3). [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:57 pm
We hold that statistical evidence does not necessarily fail to establish a prima facie case because it does not address the employer’s proffered non-discriminatory reasons for the discharge. [read post]
29 May 2012, 1:24 pm
(John McCoy/Staff Photographer) Paulette Breen sensed something was wrong when her home loan modification made her mortgage payments more expensive. [read post]
29 May 2012, 12:21 pm
John Lewis, at the Congressional Black Caucus Faith Leaders’ Summit. [read post]
29 May 2012, 7:54 am
What does a settlement plan cost? [read post]
29 May 2012, 4:48 am
In this case, one of many similar cases brought around the same time by automotive workers against the same companies, the plaintiff called John C. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:19 am
That argument does not appeal to me in the least. [read post]
28 May 2012, 10:25 am
John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1 (1966): “(1) the scope and content of the prior art; (2) the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art; (3) the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art; and (4) evidence of secondary factors, such as commercial success, long-felt need, and the failure of others. [read post]
28 May 2012, 4:08 am
Tim Kevan, a good mate, has branched out with a new series of humorous law post on his Barrister blog: My new series of humourous legal posts Professor John Flood’s RATs blog is another of my favourites – veering as it does between the serious and irreverent. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:30 pm
The mean Total score for the entire four-year sample is about 31.6, and no single year’s mean score is statistically different from the overall average at 1% or 5% levels. [read post]
27 May 2012, 7:05 am
" This includes W-3 who lives next door to him on one side, and W-11 and 20, who live next door to him on the other side, W-1, one of the two sisters across the way, and W-19, also across the way, who was getting ready to let her dog out. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:57 am
This month, John P. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:54 am
In an age of ubiquitous Googling, one downside of Google is it does not determine the length of an article. [read post]
