Search for: "Level v. State"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 29,836
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2018, 12:54 pm
For example, in VantagePoint Venture Partners 1996 v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 11:48 am
Supreme Court held in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 10:43 am
However, he found that the very fact that a taste is ephemeral, volatile and unstable is actually an obstacle to its qualification as a work for the sake of copyright protection.AG Melchior WatheletIssues and potential problems raised by the OpinionThe Opinion of AG Wathelet raises a number of issues [thanks to @SikkeKingma, @toblu_de, @martailj, @jhtc, @cjbuccafusco, @questforbooty for the discussions already held on Twitter].EU pre-emptionThe first one is not particularly surprising, and is… [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 4:37 am
How about the IT staffs at the district, circuit, and national levels who are tasked with maintaining the computers and other digital equipment that make the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
Owens v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 3:00 am
Owens v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
The 1938 ruling in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
Because of its massive reach across much of the world, the platform can effectively censor public speech, perform psychological experiments, and potentially sway elections on the scale of a nation-state. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:33 am
Peruta v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 10:15 am
” The same tension exists for “providing a different level or quality of goods or services. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:18 am
Frye [9] and Lafler v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:12 am
Single state-level administration of all sales taxes in the state. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:00 am
In Sugar Grove Township v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:59 am
This is outwith the competence of the Scottish Parliament. 1453: The Advocate General states that the Scottish Parliament cannot proceed on basis that it will amend its legislation in future if it needs to. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:11 am
The panel rejected this argument, as the Act does not prevent the registration of marks, even if might impact the level of protection to those marks. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 1:11 am
The panel rejected this argument, as the Act does not prevent the registration of marks, even if might impact the level of protection to those marks. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Last month, though, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in South Dakota v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 7:12 pm
The Supreme Court infamously ruled in Dep’t of Navy v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:29 pm
Wanjiku asked the district court in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:13 pm
Post Foods, LLC v. [read post]
