Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 8881 - 8900
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
., 973 P.2d 527, 542 (Cal. 1999)), which don’t follow anybody else’s pattern. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 8:00 pm
The more a lawyer used Zite for sharing or by marking preferences, the “smarter” Zite got. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:21 pm
Bradley Manning, who allegedly leaked confidential government documents, to WikiLeaks, and Andrew ‘Weev’ Auernheimer, who allegedly hacked AT&T’s servers, were both convicted under the CFAA. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:21 am
No matter which insurance carrier is involved, that claims representative will immediately start taking precautions to minimize the payout by trying to downplay or discount any claims that the driver was drowsy at the time of the incident. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:22 am
I can’t find one. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm
Before reaching these claims, however, the court had to dispense with a “preliminary matter”—the precedential value of the U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 8:16 am
Don’t like Mark Steyn? [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 6:03 am
” Since the comparative ads at issue here weren’t part of paid ads, but instead displayed on Armstrong’s own website, that didn’t matter. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:43 am
It didn’t matter that “crisps” was later removed from the nutritional facts information. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 11:54 pm
Perhaps then, in cases involving pure commercial gain with no element of parody or public interest, this presents a potential escape from the clutches of Laugh it Off, not only in copyright matters but trade mark dilution matters too? [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am
Expertise in the age of the internet: not as much of a gatekeeper function; gatekeeper mattered when space in which knowledge was stored was somewhat scarce (e.g., library shelves). [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 4:04 am
Everyone can voice their opinion, no matter how stupid it is. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 10:06 am
Even if the consumer is getting them from Australia herself by buying them on eBay, apparently, the variation in details, including details in the warranty, still means that there will be confusion as a matter of law. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 10:10 am
So why shouldn’t we worry? [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 7:53 am
Gleason, 160 F.3d 858, 882 (2d Cir. 1998) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
Which doctor’s understanding and opinion matters was less clear in Guenther. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 5:37 am
We have a matter pending right now where the parties didn’t agree on a solution: my firm worked on the matter for 14 months without getting paid. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 1:28 pm
Whether the hubris is due to a feeling that they can’t be caught or that, if they are caught, they are certain it doesn’t matter, that hubris is often proved very wrong. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 12:42 pm
I have also done some legal work for Google, such as writing this commissioned white paper, but not on any matter related to this case.) [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:06 am
Isn’t it a great invention? [read post]
