Search for: "STATE V. POWERS"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 41,395
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
In Robinson v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:54 pm
[An overlooked part of United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
The factual background about how we got to this state of events is equally -- if not more -- depressing.A mother (A.R.) and daughter (J.E.) get into an argument. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 1:21 pm
Background On AB 5 AB 5, as of January 1, 2020, codified the ABC Test for employee status adopted in the California Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 11:18 am
Portions of critical infrastructure, such as the power supply in Ukraine, have been disabled. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
(Cites to Erie, State Farm). [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 8:59 am
Davis in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:46 am
In addition to expanding the applicability of the ABC Test, AB 5 also provided for broad governmental enforcement powers. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 7:09 am
Miyoko’s Kitchen v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 6:56 am
GlaxoSmithKline LLC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm
Rather than using his position of power to help people cope with the raging COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 2:24 pm
Circuit’s decision in FEC v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:38 am
The most famous, or infamous, exercise of the presidential pardon power in modern times occurred on September 8, 1974:BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAA PROCLAMATIONRichard Nixon became the thirty-seventh President of the United States on January 20, 1969 and was reelected in 1972 for a second term by the electors of forty-nine of the fifty states. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices capable of… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:00 am
In National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 8:11 pm
” The Ontario Superior Court of Justice just released a new decision in CCLA v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 10:56 am
See Mary Doe v. [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 6:34 am
“the Former Spouses’ Protection Act does not grant state courts the power to treat as property divisible upon divorce military retirement pay that has been waived to receive veterans’ disability benefits” Mansell v. [read post]
5 Sep 2020, 12:36 am
As for the legal standard for tying, Epic refers to the Ninth Circuit's 2008 Cascade Health Sols. v. [read post]