Search for: "State of California v. United States"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 13,835
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Apr 2009, 5:57 pm
Brown 128 S.Ct. 2408 (2008) - California law that anyone who receives more than $10,000 from the state can't use those funds to engage in anti-union activity. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 8:10 pm
Witt Home Ranch, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:12 am
Petition for certiorari Title: United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:04 am
Via Orin Kerr and John Wesley Hall, a California Court of Appeals held that night vision goggles are a constitutionally acceptable means of seeing what you couldn't otherwise see. in People v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 10:30 am
Mashal has been admitted to the State Bar of California and the Bar of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 6:29 am
The Bad: Coincidently, in another case involving a putative consumer fraud class claim over depictions of fruits on a label, Judge Gorton of the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts in Wiley v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 5:19 pm
Bank N.A. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 2:18 pm
California, 403 U.S. 15, 20 (1971)). [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 9:07 am
John's United Church of Christ, et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2019, 9:02 pm
Bull, research director of the Administrative Conference of the United States; Colleen V. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
District Court for the Northern District of California, San Jose Division, is scheduled to hear a motion for preliminary approval of the record data breach settlement in the Anthem class action case. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 7:43 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 11:39 am
This means a corporation incorporated in Delaware could do business in California and that state could not discriminate against it in favor of California corporations. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
United States, 19-783. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 4:28 pm
The winning firm is Hausfeld, a firm with offices in the United States and Europe. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:08 am
Spidell Publishing reported last week that the United States District Court for the Northern District of California lifted the temporary ban on same-sex marriages on August 12, 2010. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 10:39 am
Malcolm, 803 F.2d 46, 54 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 910 (1987) (city has standing for third-party claim against state as to claims based on prison overcrowding); United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 7:08 am
California and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 2:38 pm
Today's decision in McDonald v. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 8:45 am
In Keene, the plaintiff, a California State Senator, argued that the Department of Justice's decision to label three films as "political propaganda" violated the First Amendment. [read post]
