Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 8881 - 8900 of 15,310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2011, 6:49 am
”  Quoting the South Carolina supreme court case Florence Morning News v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
It asks (1) whether the Louisiana courts erred in failing to find that the states failure to disclose exculpatory evidence violated its obligation under Brady v. [read post]
14 Jun 2019, 1:57 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  And it’s gotten longer and longer b/c of © owners’ political power. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 11:45 am by Orin S. Kerr
I think it's easy, and helpful, to state the rules up front and to then focus the materials on the hard part of how they apply and whether they are persuasively justified. [read post]
23 Jul 2007, 8:02 am
Waldrip, Judge Representing Appellant (Plaintiff): Steve C. [read post]
1 May 2024, 3:31 am by Alessandro Cerri
 Kneipp's position was that the documents produced by Patou did not provide evidence of JOY's reputation in France, because market share is a critical factor in evidencing a mark's reputation and the perfume Joy by Jean Patou was: (a) sold only by selected luxury and prominent retailers; and (b) had generated only a low turnover in 2016, 2017 and 2018, with a steady decrease since 2016. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
The following non‑exhaustive list of factors may assist in the court’s analysis: (a) the effect of arbitration on the integrity of the insolvency proceedings, which are intended to minimize economic prejudice to creditors; (b) the relative prejudice to the parties to the arbitration agreement and the debtor’s stakeholders; (c) the urgency of resolving the dispute; (d) the effect of a stay of proceedings arising from the bankruptcy or insolvency… [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Article 8 (family life): Reliance was placed by Counsel for Mr O'Dwyer on observations on Article 8 in Bermingham & others v USA [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin) where Laws LJ stated (at [121]) that:'I do not accept (the US) submission that the possibility of trial in the United Kingdom is legally irrelevant. [read post]