Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 19,260
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2013, 11:35 am
Justice Department event marking the 50th anniversary of the high court's landmark Gideon v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:22 am
In a press release, the Met stated that the arrests were for affray, public order offenses, breach of the peace and conspiracy to cause a public nuisance. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 9:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:12 am
Implant Direct Sybron Intern. v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 9:24 am
Patel v. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
It starts with a consideration of the Chinese state constitution. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 1:34 pm
This is important because some states have different laws surrounding NDAs.[5] 9. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 1:04 pm
In Drummond v. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
Farm Bureau Fed'n v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 6:42 am
Bruce Fischer, Esq., P.C., 78 AD3d 1016, 1018 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 6:08 am
In a podcast for Dropout Nation, California state senator Gloria Romano discusses “her amicus brief in theFriedrichs v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 6:00 am
For example, Chief Justice Warren’s deferential approach to Congress in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 2:42 pm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit 2006) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:26 am
Florida v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
This marked the first time that the government has come to the defense before the Justices of two key tactics federal judges have used in implementing the Supreme Court’s 2008 decision giving Guantanamo captives a right to go to court to seek their release. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:05 pm
” Normandeau v. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 1:55 pm
The extent of the director's personal involvement and his state of mind is important. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 4:00 am
Loufrani, Oppositions Nos. 91150278, 91154632, and 91152145 [Two Wal-Mart oppositions to registration of the SMILEY & Design mark shown below left (face design disclaimed) for hundreds of identified goods and services, on the grounds of likely confusion with Opposer's previously-used design mark (below right) and failure to function as a mark (lack of inherent distinctiveness); Loufrani opposition to registration of the design mark shown below right… [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 5:19 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 7:39 pm
See MeUndies, Inc. v. [read post]
