Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 13,226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2012, 6:58 am
Metropolitan Movers Assoc. v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 3:56 am
New York's criminal courts have addressed this question in People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 2:33 am
Thus, I am included in the Supreme Court of the State of New York civil action of Rakofsky v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am
On the other hand, he basically seemed, at least from my perspective, to think that if the court were simply to reaffirm what it did in FCC v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:09 am
Cicelski Having just returned from watching oral arguments at the Supreme Court in the highly anticipated case Federal Communications Commission v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:42 am
Columbus Steel Castings Co. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:42 am
Columbus Steel Castings Co. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm
They state that, “It is impossible to define all types of activity which may be suitable for prosecution. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:15 am
The fourth quarter of 2011 also saw some very large leveraged buyout transactions in the United States which bodes well for the higher end of the market in Canada, which transactions we have not seen domestically for several years. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 3:00 am
If there's anything worse than failing to specify standards for the alternative valuation, it's providing no alternative, as when the buy-sell mandates use of the stale fixed price, which brings us to this week's featured case, DeMatteo v. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:56 pm
Begging the question, does the next age in software protection belong to copyright (see Apple v Psystar, Oracle v Google)? [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
WCI v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 6:16 pm
In the recent case of Varrenti v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 11:57 am
The Fifth Circuit's recent opinion in United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 9:17 am
See Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 3:01 pm
By allowing indirect purchasers who had no standing to sue under their state's antitrust laws to be part of the settlement class, the appellate majority has created a “come one, come all” environment that “sets the class action ship in [the Ninth] Circuit badly adrift,” the dissent argued.The decision is Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 11:19 am
State land use planning laws may also be implicated. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:31 am
” United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:26 am
For example, in the case of Railroad Development Corporation v. [read post]
