Search for: "Story v. State"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 17,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2014, 4:02 am
The Supreme Court of Canada stated the proper procedure in a case called R. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
There is a story this in the Press Gazette. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:33 am
The Maine Supreme Judicial Court decided Jeffrey Cookson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am
: The Story of United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 12:56 am
Local media outlets became aware of and interested in the story. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:48 am
In Mayo v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
Bull and Carmell v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:55 am
By Merrill BentCate v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:00 am
This Atlantic article highlights Wolfe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 12:43 am
Enki Corporation v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 6:10 am
Lawfare returns to Fort Meade’s storied CCTV outpost, this time for arraignment in the Guantanamo military commission case of United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:05 am
I will save a detailed discussion of this doctrine for future blog posts, but the short story is that federalism concerns have led the courts to exempt conduct by the state as a sovereign from antitrust scrutiny. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
In Correctional Services Corp. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 5:36 am
” For more on the case, check out this news story. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:44 am
Veseley v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 6:31 am
Alkhafaji v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Also at The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr outlines “some of the possible Fourth Amendment rules that the Court might consider” in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 3:14 am
Awad v. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 12:12 pm
But I bet that it gives short shrift to the most important aspect of her story: the contributions that she, her late husband, and her stepson made to the law of federal jurisdiction involving probate courts and bankruptcy tribunals, in the form of the Marshall v. [read post]
