Search for: "Study v. State"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 15,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2013, 5:39 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
For example, in the seminal case of United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:54 pm
As regards Example 5, other study arms used less than 4 mg of zoledronate, albeit at more frequent intervals. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 2:07 pm
State Bar of California, No. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
United States, Kingsley Books v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:45 am
” The baby naming laws of individual states, Larson’s study found, vary widely. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
For example, in Warman v Fournier, a 2012 Federal Court of Canada decision, the court acknowledged the need for a broad approach to the news reporting purpose. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 3:30 am
However, the use of international human rights law to affect a paradigm shift in analyzing domestic violence cases and other gendered crimes such as trafficking is a hot topic in the United States since the 2011 decision in Jessica Lenahan (Gonzales) v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 7:02 pm
The petition of the day is: One and Ken Valley Housing Group v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 5:29 pm
She has reformed, will finish her studies, and will continue supporting her seven kids. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:57 pm
[v] (The apparent search for pockets is reflected in the naming of third parties as well. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 1:03 pm
The questions were asked as a part of Caronia v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 12:41 pm
Judge Leon said that the Supreme Court in the case of Smith v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 4:05 am
McClain, Against Agnosticism: Why the Liberal State Isn't Just One (Authority) Among the Many, (Boston University Law Review, Vol. 93 (December 2013)).From SmartCILP and elsewhere:John Makdisi, Uncaring Justice: Why Jacque v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 3:09 am
In his opinion in Valinote v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:05 pm
He wrote in State v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
"Detailed analysis of Federal Circuit hearing in Oracle v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 11:58 am
V. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 11:04 am
Circuit, in Sottera, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 2:36 am
Are the Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood cases about employee health insurance plan coverage of contraception, writ large, or—as the plaintiffs in those two cases would have it—“only” about coverage of “abortifacients,” or about four discrete forms of birth control? [read post]
