Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 8,963
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2007, 1:04 pm
United States Department of Education, No. 05-1508, suggested that the Justices are likely to be divided over the question whether the federal Impact Aid statute is ambiguous and, therefore, the Department of Education (DOE) regulations implementing the Impact Aid program are entitled to Chevron deference. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:35 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
Gonzales, No. 06-1420, affirms the removal of a legal alien that was a legal permanent resident of the United States. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 12:56 pm
He also affirmed, in response to a question from Justice Stevens, that the United States was arguing that forum non conveniens can be considered before both subject-matter and personal jurisdiction. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 9:45 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 6:30 pm
Appearing as an amicus on behalf of petitioners, the United States argues that the Washington statute "struck a reasonable balance between the two competing government interests" in permitting agency shop arrangements and in protecting the First Amendment rights of workers. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 3:58 pm
In Monday's oral arguments in No. 05-1345, United Haulers Ass'n v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:54 pm
United States Department of Education, in which it will decide whether to uphold a set of Department of Education regulations relating to the federal Impact Aid program. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Sea Star Line, LLC, 06-606 QP: "Whether the Carmack Amendment applies to the inland leg of a multimodal shipment to a place in the United States from a place in a territory of the United States even if the inland carrier does not issue a separate bill of lading for the inland leg. [read post]
8 Jan 2007, 3:22 pm
He will split his time with Douglas Hallward-Driemeier, Assistant to the Solicitor General, who represents the United States as amicus curiae in support of petitioner. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 8:27 am
In Monday's second argument, United Haulers Ass'n v. [read post]
6 Jan 2007, 9:32 am
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2007, 8:55 am
Klein said he felt the court of appeals' ruling wasn't clear on the veto issue, and he authorized Schuster to move the case to the state Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 9:40 am
United States, ___ A.2d ___, 2006 WL 3794331 (D.C. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 3:20 am
The annex states that "petitioners seeking to submit a request for de-listing can do so either through the focal point process outlined below or through their state of residence or citizenship. [read post]
2 Jan 2007, 12:32 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCriminal PracticeSuppression Denied to Voluntary Post-Arrest Statement; Probable Cause for Arrest Noted United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2006, 7:20 am
Today's order states, in full:Upon consideration of the unopposed motion of retired federal jurists for leave to file brief amici curiae in support of petitioners regarding the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and the lodged brief, it is ORDERED that the motion for leave to file be denied. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 9:44 am
The day the suit was filed, United States District Judge John Kane signed an Order to Show Cause why the Petitioners' Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus should not be granted. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 5:26 am
Another psychiatrist stated that he is claustrophobic and hates his apartment.The court also finds that petitioner need not prove that respondent lived at an alternative address during the Golub period. [read post]
22 Dec 2006, 2:09 am
Source: New York State Legislative Retrieval System (LRS). [read post]
