Search for: "United States v. California"
Results 8881 - 8900
of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2013, 6:15 am
Perry (the challenge to California’s Proposition 8) and United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 6:33 am
In response to readers’ questions, Eugene Volokh explains at the Volokh Conspiracy why United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 8:09 am
In Windsor, the United States asked for the judgment to be affirmed, which should have scuttled the case. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 11:30 am
California, 22O150, is a rare kind of relist: It involves a beef between two states, as Arizona is seeking leave to file a bill of complaint in the Supreme Court against California. [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:01 am
And California state courts have never read the statute as having such an implied exemption. [read post]
24 Oct 2015, 5:32 am
” He then explained how standing issues complicate the United States’ potential to accommodate European demands for judicial redress for data collection. [read post]
19 May 2017, 12:23 pm
Co. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:01 am
United Electrical Radio & Machine Workers of America, (U.E.) [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:46 pm
Walker, Judge, United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 10:13 am
The United States Supreme Court has a long line of cases addressing cities and states that penalize speech in public places. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:34 am
’ United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
Decision from ESWR’s site Audio from 9th Circuit and from ESWR Text follows: Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 5:04 am
United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
The NWPR was enacted during the Trump administration and represents the EPA’s latest attempt to define the term “waters of the United States” (“WOTUS”). [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
The SmithKline panel instead decided that Witt’s rational-basis-review approach is inconsistent with—and thus no longer binding because of—the Supreme Court’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 5:25 am
Superior Court of California, Solano Cty., 480 U.S. 102 (1987); Glencore Grain Rotterdam B.V. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm
United States, 17-8160, apparently involving the same issue as the already granted United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
United States, 17-778, United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 7:01 am
Dukes and AT&T v. [read post]
