Search for: "Claimant(s)" Results 8901 - 8920 of 26,249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Dec 2017, 10:27 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Without this, these disabled Americans who could no longer work and are not on a spouse’s family insurance plan from an employer, would not be able to afford much needed medical treatment. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 9:49 am by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
On review, the appellate court ultimately upheld the lower court’s decision to deny the employee’s motion to offer additional medical testimony and denial of coverage for the left hip replacement surgery. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:38 am by Daily Record Staff
At all times relevant to this case, the workers’ compensation claimant, Thomas J. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 7:31 am by Daily Record Staff
Civil litigation — Motion for new trial — Failure to recuse In this case, Christopher Bird, appellant/claimant (“Bird”), appeals a motion for a new trial which was granted by the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County in favor of Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), the appellant/employer (hereinafter “WMATA”). [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Based upon the forgoing, defendants’ counterclaim for attorney’s fees;is also dismissed. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 12:35 pm by William K. Berenson
Plan and conduct your negotiating strategy The insurance adjuster’s job, of course, is to pay as little as possible to claimants. [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:26 am
 Case In PointIn a Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Arbitration Statement of Claim filed in November 2017, Claimant Sabota sought an expungement from his Central Registration Depository record (“CRD”) of three customer complaints involving the:transfer of an account between brokerage firms, selection of sub-accounts in a variable annuity, and selling away involving an employee under Claimants… [read post]
26 Dec 2017, 3:23 am
[TTABlogged here].We hold that a likelihood of confusion claim based on the claimants use of two marks conjointly must be pleaded clearly enough to provide fair notice of the claim to the defendant. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 1:15 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Whether or not the claimants in these cases will prevail on this theory, it is hard to avoid the sense that the claimants asserting these claims may not be the most sympathetic. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm by Matt Pulle
Co. of Canada (2006), the Sixth Circuit applied the futility doctrine to excuse the claimants failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 1:50 pm by Matt Pulle
Co. of Canada (2006), the Sixth Circuit applied the futility doctrine to excuse the claimants failure to exhaust his administrative remedies. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 11:19 am by Gregory Dell
Disability Insurance News:Colorado District Court overturns denial of benefits by Life Insurance Company of North America Court finds LINA’s challenge on claimants credibility unfounded. [read post]
22 Dec 2017, 2:35 am by INFORRM
– Philip Steele News: Privacy injunction granted against the Sun, first reported privacy injunction of 2017 Case Report: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Days 1 and 2: claimants evidence and defendant’s closing submissions Case Law: Jack Monroe v Katie Hopkins, Success for claimant in Twitter libel case – Nathan Capone Case Law, India: Puttaswamy v Union of India, Supreme Court recognises a constitutional right to privacy in a landmark… [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm by Andrea DeField
Andrews suggests, the majority’s narrow reading of the definition of “suit” vis-à-vis the Chapter 558 process “means that the insured won’t know if it will have a defense provided (which makes it even less likely that it will respond and attempt to reach a resolution) and the claimant won’t know if there is going to be a meaningful process undertaken, at all. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 1:44 pm by Andrea DeField
Andrews suggests, the majority’s narrow reading of the definition of “suit” vis-à-vis the Chapter 558 process “means that the insured won’t know if it will have a defense provided (which makes it even less likely that it will respond and attempt to reach a resolution) and the claimant won’t know if there is going to be a meaningful process undertaken, at all. [read post]