Search for: "Cross v. State" Results 8901 - 8920 of 16,710
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Nov 2017, 9:12 am by Lorelie S. Masters and Paul T. Moura
  For example, the New York Insurance Law specifically provides that evidence relating to other “similarly situated” policyholders is relevant to the issue of the materiality of an alleged misrepresentation in the policy application.5 As exemplified by the New York Court of Appeals in Belt Painting v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:25 am
  Shortly before cross-examination, AbbVie indicated that they would not be cross-examined, and the Claimants' evidence therefore stood unchallenged. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 12:46 pm by Florian Mueller
" Qualcomm complained that using those transcripts would be unfair because "Qualcomm had no opportunity to attend the hearings and cross-examine the witnesses" (unlike at the later stages of the FTC v. [read post]
14 Nov 2006, 1:41 pm
Since the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdi v. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 9:34 am by Eugene Volokh
" The same sort of reasoning explains why a State may outlaw cross burning (and only cross burning) done with the intent to intimidate: "because burning a cross is a particularly virulent form of intimidation. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (HC) v Secretary of State for Works and Pensions & Ors, heard 21-22 Jun 2017. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 3:49 pm by Amy Howe
Supreme Court ordered the state supreme court to reconsider that ruling in light of the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Foster v. [read post]
16 Dec 2020, 6:21 pm by Chukwuma Okoli
However, we seem not to appreciate the nexus between PIL and the promotion of cross border commercial transactions. [read post]