Search for: "Does, 1-25" Results 8901 - 8920 of 18,534
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2016, 1:21 pm by Shea Denning
See 18B-300(c)(1)(authorizing cities and towns to adopt such regulations). [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:49 am by Peter Mahler
Three Questions Question #1:  Does the Qadan ruling set a precedent against imposing personal liability on the majority shareholders for compelled buy-outs in dissolution proceedings, absent evidence sufficient to pierce the corporate veil? [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
However, USDA does equivalency reviews for meat, poultry and eggs all the time without blocking a country’s imports while the review is underway. [read post]
30 May 2016, 9:00 pm by Jan von Hein
It furthermore prohibits discrimination against customers in four specific cases of the sale of goods and services and does not allow the circumventing of such a ban on discrimination in passive sales agreements. [read post]
27 May 2016, 9:38 am by Anthony Zaller
Starting July 1, 2016, the minimum wage in the City of Los Angeles will increase according to the following rate: Effective Date Employers With 26 or more Employees Employers with 25 or fewer Employees or Non-Profit corporations with 26 or more Employees with approval to pay a deferred rate 7/1/2016 $10.50 Deferred 7/1/2017 $12.00 $10.50 7/1/2018 $13.25 $12.00 7/1/2019 $14.25 $13.25 7/1/2020 $15.00 $14.25 7/1/2021 $15.00 $15.00… [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am by INFORRM
Their Lordships considered that without an interim injunction the purpose of any trial of this action would be undermined: [1]. [read post]
25 May 2016, 4:39 am by Zoe Bedell
And although it notifies individuals when their requests are denied, it does not explain why. [read post]
24 May 2016, 1:23 pm by randywallace
 An injured person does not have to show that the dog or animal has previously bitten, but the animal owner does not incur liability for any and every bite. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:00 am by FHH Law
As frequent visitors here know, that publication does a couple of things. [read post]
20 May 2016, 12:58 pm by Joshua A. Stein
  The penalties would be triggered if:  (i) the animal is not a service animal with regard to the person in question; and/or (ii) the person does not have a disability. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:43 am by Jamie Markham
Thus, for offenses committed between October 1, 1994, and December 1, 1998, the review is still required. [read post]