Search for: "High v State"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 35,522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2019, 9:54 am
In Shanahan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 4:28 pm
Given its findings, the judgment handed down by the Johannesburg High Court on 30 May 2019 in the case of Trevor Manuel v Economic Freedom Fighters and Others ([2019] ZAGPJHC 157) can be viewed as a significant victory against fake news. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:38 pm
Federal Courts Mozilla Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 11:39 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:18 am
Because “a rule may be mandatory without being jurisdictional, and Title VII’s charge-filing requirement fits that bill,” the Fifth Circuit’s reversal of summary judgment against the employee was affirmed (Fort Bend County, Texas v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
In 2018, in the case of Mattina v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
In 2018, in the case of Mattina v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 3:50 am
At the National Conference of State Legislators’ blog, Lisa Soronen looks at Allen v. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 2:51 am
The Law Offices of Leah V. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
For instance, a 1930s High Court judge named Douglas Young put up considerable resistance to a distinctively colonial provision of criminal procedure that endangered defendants' right to a fair trial. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Under Ake v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 7:08 am
Ct. 2018) and Noffsinger v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
In Minor v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:39 am
The United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals (which hears appeals from the federal district courts in New Jersey, Delaware, Pennsylvania and the United States Virgin Islands) recently had the opportunity to address the state of New Jersey employment law on restrictive covenants in the case of ADP, LLC v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 11:38 am
The Midwestern agricultural states were hit particularly hard. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 10:57 am
In Tanimura & Antle Fresh Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 6:14 am
The 6th Circuit Court ruled last summer in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 5:53 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 11:34 pm
The Court of Appeal ultimately concluded that the High Court was correct i.e. the designs were valid but not infringed. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 2:23 pm
At this hearing the judge also stated that based on NRG v. [read post]
