Search for: "Judge v. United States"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 35,309
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm
(Pregnancy, according to the judge, is a “normal physiological state” and a “natural process essential to perpetuating human life. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
United States, supra ). [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 11:05 am
Judge Alex Kozinski of the U.S. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 6:33 am
Today in the Community we are discussing Arizona v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 8:38 pm
In United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 11:00 am
The Sixth Circuit recently affirmed the denial of a motion to suppress in United States v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 1:16 pm
The dissent argued that the certified order from the Court of Federal Claims did not confer appellate jurisdiction over the earlier dismissal of infringement claims against the United States, citing United States v. [read post]
24 May 2021, 4:21 pm
The case, United States v. [read post]
19 May 2009, 4:47 am
Section 460 of Title 28 of the United States Code notes that judicial authority extends to “each court created by Act of Congress in a territory which is invested with any jurisdiction of a district court of the United States, and to the judges thereof. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 9:12 am
United States, 156 U. [read post]
5 Jan 2014, 3:30 pm
One of the most important, if not the most important, United States copyright cases decided in 2013 is The Authors Guild, Inc. v Google Inc. 2013 WL 6017130 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 4:51 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2013, 5:29 pm
First, it is important to note for laypersons that law gets made in the United States in one of two ways, either by statutes and regulations created by legislatures, or by case law from courts of appeal deciding certain issues on appeal from the trial court. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 6:28 pm
In Texas State Technical College v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 3:50 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 7:25 pm
The Iowa Supreme Court stated the following as its first holding in State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2017, 4:00 am
LEXIS 212172 (SD NY, Dec. 27, 2017), a New York federal district court allowed a Muslim inmate to move ahead with his complaint that during Ramadan, his medications were delivered during fasting hours.In United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
United States, 2015 U.S. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 8:00 am
Willis v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 9:40 am
See United States v. [read post]
