Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 13,105
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
The United States had abandoned the argument that the Anti-Injunction Act barred the health care lawsuits, but urged the justices in its petition to resolve the question. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
Yang v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:30 am
" Montoya admitted also that D.S.D.'s desire to remain in the United States wavered. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:28 am
The United States lists about a dozen statutes that are similar to RESPA in that they authorize damages without a showing of harm in a particular case. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 11:26 am
Petitioner did not visit the Children after he left the United States in July 2010 and before he filed the Petition. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 7:20 am
From SCOTSUBlog, it appears that there will be some interesting amicus briefs filed in connection with the cert petition in United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Bauman, et al. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 10:00 am
And Virginia v. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Goel v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:04 pm
When we last looked in on Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:39 am
Please address application packets to: Matthew Maddox Program Coordinator United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia Albert V. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 11:08 am
In any event, the Appellate Division stated that his contention was without merit because the father's income for the purpose of calculating his child support obligation includes imputed income (Family Ct Act 413[1][b][5][iv], [v] ), and thus his income was above the federal poverty income guidelines (see generally s 413[1][g]; Matter of Julianska v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Certiorari-stage documents Petition for certiorari Memorandum for the United States Wetzel v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 8:47 am
As Moncrieffe v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:16 pm
Perhaps rebordering the Internet is inevitable, but it's bad policy for the United States to be cutting off transborder data flows, even for the putatively noble purpose of suppressing copyright infringement. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 2:59 pm
Recently, in Citizens United v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Simmons v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Barasch v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 11:55 am
The uniting thread among the various factions within the Progressive Movement was the view that government in the United States had become systematically corrupt. [read post]
