Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 14,895
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
Interestingly, Halstead Bead Inc., a small out-of-state retailer that challenged Louisiana’s decentralized local sales and use tax administration in federal court[5], informed the U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of the… [read post]
17 Oct 2012, 3:20 pm
(quoting Hawthorne v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Lund. 50 Connecticut Law Review 849-985 (2018).Allan W. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 6:27 am
On August 2, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Arthur D. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 10:59 am
United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:04 pm
(See Cashion v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive license:… [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 6:37 am
An employee who alleged that in the five months after she injured her knee at work her employer took her picture and stalked her as she attempted to work and threatened to fire her if she did not climb a ladder to replace light bulbs sufficiently stated a hostile work environment claim, a federal district court in Maryland ruled (Teasdell v Baltimore County Board of Education, September 6, 2013, Quarles, W, Jr). [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 am
Hadfield v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 10:19 am
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. [read post]
23 Aug 2024, 3:58 am
“‘Successive motions for summary judgment should not be entertained without a showing of newly discovered evidence or other sufficient justification”‘ (Maggio v 24 W 57 APF, LLC, 134 AD3d 621, 625 [1st Dept 2015], quoting Jones v 636 Holding Corp., 73 AD3d 409,409 [1st Dept 2010]; see also Pough v Aegis Prop. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:09 am
Keel v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:22 am
The chart is taken from an 8/24/12 post entitledThe Older You Are, The More Important You Consider The iPad To Be from the Business Insider's "Chart of the Day" series. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 7:24 am
Harris, April 12, 2017, Kayatta, W.). [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:29 am
, State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 5:05 am
The second context is where a State-owned entity with separate legal personality is the signatory and it is sought to bind the State to the arbitration agreement. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 6:36 pm
However, the bench that heard today’s oral argument in Howell v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:06 am
Texas Adjutant General’s Office v. [read post]
