Search for: "State v. Childs"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 21,048
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2014, 3:25 pm
The undisputed facts enumerate that by an April 1998 Information, the State of Florida charged, on October 1, 1997, the petitioner, who was 18 at the time, for violating former Florida Statutes § 800.04(3) by committing an act of Sexual Battery as defined in Florida Statutes § 794.011(1)(h) upon a child under the age of 16. [read post]
29 Sep 2019, 4:15 pm
Parental/child immunity was abrogated by the Florida Supreme Court in Ard v. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 5:01 am
A recent United States Tax Court case, Quintal v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 12:30 pm
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently held in the case of State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 6:59 am
Law Lessons from STATE OF NEW JERSEY V. [read post]
23 May 2011, 3:57 pm
No one knows what the Supreme Court will do in Turner v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 5:25 am
The recent case of Wade v. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 9:50 pm
MA (Somalia) (Respondent) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) [2010] UKSC 49. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 1:03 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 1:32 am
In Cornerstone Christian Schools v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:27 am
State v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:10 pm
The case, US v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 12:13 pm
(Eugene Volokh) In State v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:37 am
[NYT; Volokh; Balko; Savage; Facebook] Amicus briefs filed in Virginia v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 4:23 pm
" Wilson v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 12:01 pm
Dist. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 8:48 am
Dist. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
In Berger-Carniol v Carniol, 273 A.D.2d 427, 710 N.Y.S.2d 114, the Second Department in 2000 held that it was proper to direct the commencement of proceedings to suspend Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 10:01 pm
In Berger-Carniol v Carniol, 273 A.D.2d 427, 710 N.Y.S.2d 114, the Second Department in 2000 held that it was proper to direct the commencement of proceedings to suspend Mr. [read post]
22 May 2012, 6:31 am
The Court decided that qualifying for benefits in this scenario hinged on the state law definition of "child. [read post]
