Search for: "State v. Fair"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 27,504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2007, 3:36 pm
Such existing remedies often yield bizarre results as we saw in the Woo v. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 11:44 am
After this seminar, on December 22, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia – in Home Care Association of America v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 12:39 pm
Earlier this week, in Coalition for Workforce Innovation v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:27 am
Grace argued that summary judgment was inappropriate in light of another FLSA suit against Family Dollar, Morgan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 3:40 pm
Supreme Court case — Geders v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:18 am
A California Court of Appeals recently ruled that employers can calculate nondiscretionary percentage bonuses using the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) calculation method detailed in FLSA regulations rather than a method described in the California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) Manual, even though the DLSE method would have resulted in more pay (Lemm v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 6:33 am
Thus, such employees are not entitled to overtime protection.In Christopher v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:01 pm
In its June 20, 2023, decision in Paulson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:28 am
Supreme Court is considering another case, Chistopher v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 10:51 am
On January 5, 2011, the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana issued a Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order in the case of Big R Towing v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 9:48 am
Coop. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
On October 13, 2017, the Third Circuit held in Secretary United States Department of Labor v. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:41 am
Dora Lane In Gordon v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:50 am
State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 11:50 am
State v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 11:25 am
The 10-3 en banc decision in Zarda v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:31 am
In Sorel v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 5:23 pm
Revisiting precedent is particularly appropriate where, as here, a departure would not upset settled expectations, see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 11:12 am
Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 3:57 am
In T-Mobile South v. [read post]
