Search for: "State v. Levell " Results 8901 - 8920 of 28,751
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2012, 5:24 am by Kali Borkoski
This is a significant level because the 50% mark appears to hold some significance for Justice Kennedy. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 4:56 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday, the court heard arguments in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 3:33 pm by Giles Peaker
Further, while child related benefits might be ‘designed to meet the needs of the child’ (R (SG and Others)) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [ 2015 ] UKSC 16 ), this could include the child’s housing costs. [read post]
Ortovox v Mammut  The UPC also considered the role of protective letters in Ortovox Sportartikel GmbH v Mammut Sports Group AG, Mammut Sports Group GmbH (“Ortovox v Mammut”). [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am by Giles Peaker
The DWP has issued a circular in the wake of the Court of Appeal judgment in MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] EWCA Civ 13 (Our report coming soon, honest). [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 9:21 am by Giles Peaker
The DWP has issued a circular in the wake of the Court of Appeal judgment in MA & Ors, R (on the application of) v The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2014] EWCA Civ 13 (Our report coming soon, honest). [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 3:13 pm by Richard Hunt
Costco claimed that it could not be liable for the refusal of a low level employee to modify its supposed policies, but the Court found no such limit in the ADA. [read post]