Search for: "State v. Light" Results 8901 - 8920 of 28,973
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2007, 5:37 am
In that case, the Baccarat Fremont Developers asked the Supreme Court for a ruling that the Ninth Circuit was required to issue a "redetermination" in light of Justice Anthony Kennedy's concurring opinion in Rapanos v. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 7:36 pm by Aurora Barnes
United States Telecom Association v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
On February 24, 2009, in No. 07-1437, Carlsbad Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
" In light of the foregoing, and given that no contrary medical opinions were presented, the Board's factual determination that claimant suffered from an occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress is supported by substantial evidence and will not be disturbed (see Matter of Garcia v MCI Interiors, Inc., 158 AD3d 907, 908 [2018]; Matter of Curtis v Xerox, 66 AD3d 1106, 1108 [2009]). [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 8:57 am
  Judge Koh, who was made globally famous when she presided in the Apple v Samsung dispute, stated that to do so would essentially be going overboard. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Iancu is likely to prove more immediately impactful to the status quo than the accompanying decision in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
Article V, because it requires two-thirds of Congress and three-fourths of the states, is, as Sandy Levinson has put it, functionally dead. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 10:40 pm by Evan Brown (@internetcases)
Polar Pro Filters, Inc. v Frogslayer LLC, 2019 WL 5400934 (S.D. [read post]