Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 8901 - 8920
of 76,236
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2015, 6:15 am
States. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 5:57 am
Trust & Guaranty Co. v. [read post]
6 Aug 2020, 12:39 pm
Alexis v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Here's what she has to say:Maximilian SchremsEven as we await the new EU Regulation on data protection, which will supersede Directive 46/95(the Data Protection Directive), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled on 6 October 2015 on the reference for a preliminary ruling in Case C-362/14 Maximilian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner, finding invalid the US-EU agreement on the processing of individuals’ personal data and the free movement of… [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm
State ex rel. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 4:40 am
State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 9:50 am
KSR Int'l Co. v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:08 am
United States, 293 F 1013 (D.C. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 5:50 am
United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 3:00 pm
§ 1226—the detention authority Congress created for a person awaiting a determination of whether they may remain in the United States. [read post]
19 May 2011, 3:25 pm
The ruling in Kentucky v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:59 am
Although other Delaware state and federal decisions have accepted the “dual jurisdiction” theory based on their interpretation of a footnote in LaNuova D&B, S.p.A. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 8:35 am
The Twitter v. [read post]
30 Jun 2009, 1:28 pm
Last month,in People v Weaver (5/12/09)(discussed here, the Court of Appeals held that the New York Constitution requires that a warrant issued upon probable cause be issued before the police can monitor someone's whereabouts by surreptitiously attaching an electronic device (GPS) to that person's automobile. [read post]
Case Comment: Hesham Ali (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2016] UKSC 60 Part One
13 Mar 2017, 2:42 am
That person is highly likely to have very strong ties to the UK but will be excluded under the Rules. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 4:54 am
The Court held that Tanksley v. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
Johnson v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 8:04 am
State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 4:42 pm
The Judge applied Hayden v Dickinson [2020] EWHC 3291 (QB) and the characterisation of the tort as “a persistent and deliberate course of unreasonable and oppressive conduct, targeted at another person, which is calculated to and does cause that person alarm, fear or distress”: this objective test is set out in s.1(2) Protection from Harassment Act 1997. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 11:37 am
I don't think selling keyword advertising on a person's name should constitute a publicity rights violation, but that issue has completely vexed Wisconsin judges in the Habush v. [read post]
