Search for: "United States v. California" Results 8901 - 8920 of 13,840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2023, 10:57 am by HRWatchdog
Departure from Federal Procedure The United States Supreme Court ruled on June 23 in Coinbase, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2006, 8:53 am
Briefs available here.In the news, a Kansas federal district court declared a mistrial in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 9:12 am by J. Gordon Hylton
On two occasions, Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 5:00 pm by Eric Biber
  Greenhouse gases emitted from the United States don’t just harm Americans. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:12 am by Anna Christensen
Petition for certiorari Title: United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:43 pm by Jim Walker
  An appellate court affirmed his conviction in the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 10:15 am by Kalvis Golde
United States 21-1576Issue: Whether the proper remedy for the government’s failure to prove venue is an acquittal barring re-prosecution of the offense, as the U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 2:23 pm by Steve Hall
“The FDA is improperly allowing drugs into the United States even though it won’t stand behind their safety and efficacy,” he said. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:03 am by John Elwood
United States, 10–150, which presents questions about whether the Supreme Court has certiorari jurisdiction to review the court of appeals’ denial of a request for authorization to file a second or successive collateral attack under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:47 pm
Plata, the justices will decide* whether a federal judge in California properly ordered the state to reduce its prison population as a remedy for longstanding unconstitutional conditions in those prisons. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:08 am by Thomas C. Berg - Guest
United States is whether this emerging situation should lead the courts – ultimately, the U.S. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 10:12 am by John Elwood
(He might have had to answer some more difficult questions, though, since he was even then seeking to regularize his immigration status after entering the United States unlawfully.) [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 6:23 am by Antitrust Today
  Judge Ware in July certified a class of “All persons who purchased or acquired an iPhone in the United States and entered into a two-year agreement with Defendant AT&T Mobility, LLC for iPhone voice and data service anytime from June 29, 2007 to the present. [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 7:59 pm by Michael Atkins
If there is no in personam jurisdiction in any judicial district of the United States, the owner may proceed in rem against the allegedly infringing domain name. [read post]