Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 8901 - 8920 of 16,272
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Sep 2013, 8:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
District Court of the Eastern District of New York awarded interim attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $3,707,313.29 to Plaintiffs who intervened in the matter of United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 4:25 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit issued recently in a civil case:  Seaton v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:08 pm by Dennis Crouch
United States, 430 U.S. 188, 193 (1977). [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:34 pm by James R. Marsh
United States, 08-cv-80736-KAM (S.D. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 9:55 am by David Cosgrove
Cir. 2007), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit evaluated the meaning of the term “conviction” in the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INS”). [read post]
1 Sep 2013, 5:54 am by Robert Kreisman
The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals in Chicago has affirmed a ruling by the federal district court judge over a copyright lawsuit involving a song. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Sixth Circuit also held that the tribe is immune from the State’s suit. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
The Sixth Circuit also held that the tribe is immune from the State’s suit. [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 7:38 am
Perhaps the most challenging expression of this tension was set out by the always engaging and challenging Chief Judge Randall Rader, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 11:37 am by Erik B. von Zeipel
    Unauthorized Access to his former employer’s Computers In support of the “no unauthorized access” argument, Nosal argued that: (1) under the Ninth Circuit’s en banc decision in this case (United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 9:46 am by Terry Hart
And under Ninth Circuit precedent, an act of infringement that does not occur entirely within the United States is considered extraterritorial. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:52 am by Gene Quinn
Just over three years ago, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Bilski v. [read post]